But, I don't think I have the right to the employer Microsoft office 2007
or the customer to stand, turn them away completely requirements. They will be for the software is difficult to maintain and suffer a loss, so, is they, and only they on the subject have the final say.
His bottom line is not quality, it's a moral.
In engaged in software development, if I were asked to develop some safe, will illicit close user information at risk of the program, I will make your choice, to this kind of request said "no". Microsoft Office 2010 is so great.
Of course, I will not be protected by law. If I was so and fired, I also had nowhere. I even can't get unemployment benefits, because I'll be think for some reason was sacked. Remember, you are active chosen this industry, so if you took this as this for a living, then you will have to take the high standard requirement in his own moral bottom line.
Robert Martin (Bob) in the commercial software uncle is confusion and ugly, "in an is stated, this kind of practice is wrong. His client has a manager said, "commercial software is bad and the ugly," to which he countered: Office 2010 is my favorite.
No!!! Not so!!!!! Business is very complex, rules may be clueless and particularity and very strong; But also to write the code doesn't have to look like. In fact, the more complex business rules, the more special, more clueless, code should be more clean and tidy. When some mess of things about the rules, you how can the disorder of the orderly change rules!!!!! To the rules of the cobwebs from messy in clear context, the only way is in the scope of what about the neat, the most clear code.